Technology patents stifle innovation. You could have heard this, and the arguments surrounding it, since the first software patents were issued. Until now, however, the common individual in the United States has not noticed really noticed the reach that intellectual property law protection has in their everyday lives. In the end, one does not miss innovation that's been crushed before the product's shipment into the supply chain. The "wouldn't it be nice if we had something similar to this" thought doesn't normally create a search for that item just to locate that somebody tried to produce it but was stopped either by being threatened with the high cost of patent infringement, threats of never ending lawsuits centered on copyright and other claims, as well as threats of federal legislation which will leave their product useless.block chain software
Today, however, rather than squelching potential technology, patent law can be utilized to prohibit the usage of technology that already exists and is used by people around the world - the Blackberry. Given what's at stake, the publicity truly can't hurt, and will likely assist the fans of innovation in their proverbial fight to produce while steering away from intellectual property restrictions. The more people who know what's happening, the more most will clamor for change in intellectual property law.blockchain technology
It is rather dangerous for BlackBerry users. An organization called NTP is seeking the court to enforce an injunction which would prohibit the sale of BlackBerries in the United States, and would also shut down email to any or all users with the exception of US government account holders. Ironically, this could signify the US Patent and Trademark Office and the federal judges hearing this case would continue to possess email access while ruling on whether that privilege will be granted to the others of us mere mortals. Since a three judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington already ruled that RIM, makers of the BlackBerry, was in violation of seven of NTP's patents, things don't look excellent for BlackBerry users now, particularly if the USPTO upholds the validity of the patents in question.
The story is really a typical one - a pc software patent on technology already used but packaged in a way that the US Patent and Trademark Office didn't recognize as "prior art," held by way of a company whose sole job is to get such patents and utilize them as clubs against any organization who creates something using technology that the patent was wrongly granted to protect. This story happens over and over in a normal year in the United States, but rarely has it been taken this far, regarding something this popular.Know more
Patent law, and other intellectual property law was created to be able to foster innovation and production of products in the United States. By granting a restricted time monopoly on technology used to make certain products or services, the public received the proper to use the technology uninhibited after the patent term (usually 17 years from the patent's issue date) has run out. In the occasions before computers and software applications, 17 years might have been a superb period of time. It might still be a fair time period for certain products which have taken years to produce and research, such as drugs. However, when speaing frankly about fundamental foundations common to MANY items which can be powered by computer software, waiting 17 years may as well kill any hopes of development or innovation in any fields even remotely touched by the patents.